Washington, D.C. – March 25, 2025
In a shocking revelation, top national security officials of the Trump administration accidentally included The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal chat, inadvertently exposing classified discussions about potential military strikes against the Houthis. The leak has sparked national security concerns and intensified scrutiny over the administration’s handling of sensitive information.
Vance Opposes Bombing Campaign
Vice President JD Vance expressed opposition to immediate military action against the Iran-backed Houthi militants, citing economic and strategic risks.
“We are making a mistake,” Vance wrote, arguing that Europe relies more on Red Sea trade than the U.S. does. He highlighted that “only 3% of U.S. trade runs through the Suez Canal, whereas 40% of European trade depends on it.” His hesitation also stemmed from concerns over the impact of rising oil prices and the lack of proper messaging to the public.
Concerns Over Trump’s Awareness
The leaked messages suggest that Vance doubted whether President Trump fully understood the strategic implications of the strikes.
“I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now,” he stated. He advocated for delaying military action by a month to align economic and diplomatic strategies.
Potential Breach of Classified Information
The chat revealed that CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth may have disclosed classified intelligence regarding upcoming military operations. Goldberg refrained from publishing certain details, citing national security risks.
Hegseth allegedly shared operational details, including “targets, weapons the U.S. would deploy, and attack sequencing.” Such disclosures have raised alarms over national security protocols within the administration.
Hostile Stance Toward European Allies
Messages between Vance and Hegseth revealed frustration with European allies, particularly regarding their reliance on U.S. military interventions.
“I just hate bailing Europe out again,” Vance wrote, to which Hegseth responded, “I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC.” These sentiments contrast with ongoing NATO collaboration in the region, as European forces have contributed to air refueling and escort missions in the Red Sea.
Emoji-Laden War Communication
Perhaps the most startling aspect of the leak was the casual manner in which officials communicated about military strikes. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz celebrated the initial bombing runs with emojis: a fist, an American flag, and fire. Similarly, Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff responded with praying hands, a flexed bicep, and two American flags.
The leaked exchange underscores concerns over the administration’s approach to military decision-making and information security. As the fallout continues, lawmakers are calling for an investigation into potential breaches of classified information and the broader implications for U.S. foreign policy.
COMMENTS