HomeElection News

Biden Administration Deems Israel’s Rafah Strike Within Acceptable Limits

The Biden administration has concluded that Israel's Rafah strike, which killed nearly 50 Palestinians, did not breach President Biden's red line, despite significant civilian casualties.

Palestinians react next to the destruction after an Israeli strike where displaced people were staying in Rafah, Gaza Strip, on May 27, 2024. | Jehad Alshrafi/AP

In a critical assessment, the Biden administration has determined that Israel’s recent military strike in Rafah, which reportedly killed nearly 50 displaced Palestinians, did not breach President Joe Biden’s established “red line.”

Despite the devastating impact, a U.S. official confirmed on Tuesday that the incident would not provoke any severe reprimand from Washington. This decision indicates that the administration views Israel’s ongoing military operations as largely acceptable, even if some actions are disapproved of.

Targeted Operations in Rafah

A senior administration official, speaking anonymously, clarified that the attack, which successfully targeted two Hamas operatives while resulting in 45 civilian casualties, remained within the acceptable boundaries set by Biden on March 9. The official emphasized that Israel’s approach in Rafah reflects a more targeted and precise strategy, which aligns with U.S. warnings and expectations.

“This is not a one-off, ‘Oops, I made a mistake on my business records,’ or even, a one-off scheme,” said Diana Florence, a former prosecutor in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

This assessment mirrors months of statements from senior administration officials. Despite several high-profile incidents resulting in civilian casualties, the U.S. continues to support Israel’s goal of defeating Hamas in Gaza. Israel’s decision to employ targeted operations instead of a large-scale invasion has been sufficient for the administration to assert that efforts are being made to minimize civilian harm.

Official Responses and Reactions

During briefings on Tuesday, U.S. government spokespeople echoed the senior official’s assessment but avoided direct references to Biden’s red lines. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller called for a “full, transparent investigation” into the strike while highlighting the difference in scale compared to previous operations in Gaza City and Khan Younis.

National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby reiterated the administration’s stance, stating, “I have no policy changes to speak to” following the Rafah strike. He emphasized that the preferred number of civilian casualties is “zero,” but acknowledged the complexity of the situation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the strike as a “tragic accident,” a sentiment echoed by Vice President Kamala Harris, who stated, “the word ‘tragic’ doesn’t even begin to describe it.”

International and Domestic Criticism

The attack has ignited severe criticism from Democrats and human rights advocates, who are urging President Biden to halt arms sales to Israel. Brian Finucane, a senior adviser to the International Crisis Group, criticized the administration’s tolerance for civilian casualties in Gaza.

Ongoing Developments in Rafah

Despite these criticisms, the administration has commended Israel’s revised approach to its Rafah operations, with senior officials noting improvements in civilian safety considerations. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan mentioned “refinements” in Israel’s plans, though no public details have been provided.

Israeli tanks have recently advanced into central Rafah, reaching a strategic zone amidst continued violence. Gazan health authorities reported further casualties from Israeli tank shelling in an evacuation zone, adding to the toll of the ongoing conflict.

Subscribe to our newsletter

COMMENTS