Former President Donald Trump’s legal team has asserted that his prolonged efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 election were part of his official duties, aiming to have his federal criminal case in Washington, D.C. dismissed. Here’s a breakdown of their arguments:
Defending Trump’s Actions
In a 52-page filing, Trump’s defense attorneys, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, argue that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case against the former president seeks to criminalize actions that fell within Trump’s responsibilities as the president. They contend that Trump’s efforts to reverse his election defeat, including claims of election fraud, were well within his White House duties, such as enforcing federal election laws. Consequently, they assert that the charges against Trump, including conspiracies to obstruct the election process and defraud the public, should be dismissed.
Immunity from Prosecution
The central argument put forth by Trump’s legal team is that Trump enjoys absolute immunity from prosecution when his actions are within the scope of his presidential duties. They emphasize that it is not for the prosecution or the court to determine the motivations behind the President’s actions. Instead, if the President’s actions fall within the ambit of his office, he is immune from prosecution.
Distinct Presidential Powers
Trump’s attorneys assert that the charges against him stem from distinct presidential powers, such as communicating with the public, organizing his administration, interacting with Congress, enforcing election laws, and ensuring the faithful execution of the Constitution. They argue that Trump’s genuine belief regarding the election’s outcome is irrelevant to assessing his immunity from prosecution.
Impeachment Acquittal
Another fundamental argument presented by Trump’s legal team is that he was acquitted by the Senate in an impeachment trial for similar conduct. They claim that this acquittal renders Trump “absolutely immune” from prosecution for related acts. They point out that the impeachment trial related to one count—inciting insurrection—stemming from his speech before the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack.
Avenues for Accountability
While the Senate acquitted Trump, Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell defended his vote by stating that former presidents are not immune from being held accountable through the criminal justice system and civil litigation. This assertion underscores the differing perspectives on where accountability for presidential actions should be sought.
Trump’s federal criminal case in Washington, D.C. is scheduled to go to trial on March 4, 2023. It represents a critical legal battle that could have significant implications for how presidential actions are scrutinized and legally addressed.
COMMENTS