HomeElection News

Trump Seeks Dismissal of Georgia Criminal Charges Ahead of Inauguration

President-elect Donald Trump is urging a Georgia court to dismiss 2020 election-related charges, citing presidential immunity. Legal questions about state-level immunity remain untested.

President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with the House GOP conference, Nov. 13, 2024, in Washington. | Allison Robbert/AP

President-elect Donald Trump has petitioned a Georgia appeals court to dismiss the criminal charges he faces for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2020 election results in the state.


Citing Presidential Immunity

In a five-page filing, Trump’s attorney Steve Sadow argues that a sitting president is immune from state or federal criminal proceedings, referencing Justice Department policies established during the Clinton administration.

“A sitting president is completely immune from indictment or any criminal process,” Sadow wrote, urging the court to dismiss the case before Trump’s upcoming inauguration.

This argument builds on legal principles that federal criminal cases against a sitting president cannot proceed. Trump’s legal team contends that the same protection should extend to state-level charges, though this remains an untested legal theory.


The Georgia Case: A Lingering Legal Challenge

The Georgia case is the last unresolved criminal charge against Trump, following the dismissal of two federal cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith last month. In Georgia, Trump faces a racketeering conspiracy charge for allegedly attempting to manipulate the state’s 2020 election results.

The case has been delayed for months as Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis battles efforts by Trump’s legal team to disqualify her. Trump and his allies claim that Willis has a financial conflict of interest due to a personal relationship with a former lead prosecutor in her office.

The Georgia Court of Appeals previously froze proceedings in the case while it examines the allegations against Willis.


Legal Precedent: Testing Presidential Immunity at the State Level

While federal immunity for a sitting president has been established, the application of that principle to state-level prosecutions is uncharted territory. Trump’s filing asserts that constitutional principles and Supreme Court rulings bar state prosecutors from pursuing criminal charges against a sitting president.

This novel argument could set a significant legal precedent if the court rules in Trump’s favor.


What’s Next?

The Georgia Court of Appeals will weigh Trump’s arguments for immunity alongside the ongoing review of the allegations against DA Fani Willis. A decision could set the stage for either the dismissal of the charges or a historic legal showdown.

As Trump prepares to assume office, his legal battles continue to shape discussions around the limits of presidential power and accountability.

Subscribe to our newsletter

COMMENTS