Trump’s Three Big Wins
- Ballot Disqualification Case:
- The Supreme Court overturned a Colorado court decision that had disqualified Trump from the 2024 ballot as an insurrectionist.
- The unanimous ruling cut off similar attempts in other states.
- Obstruction Statute Narrowing:
- The court narrowed the application of a criminal obstruction statute used in prosecuting January 6 defendants.
- This decision potentially undermines two charges against Trump in the federal election subversion case.
- Presidential Immunity:
- The justices ruled that Trump, and other presidents, are immune from criminal prosecution for actions tied to their constitutional powers.
- Although Trump’s request to dismiss the indictment was denied, the decision provides significant protection from prosecution for presidential acts.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Independent Stance
- Breaking with Conservative Colleagues:
- Barrett diverged from other GOP-appointed justices in key cases, including abortion pill access, social media censorship, and charges against January 6 defendants.
- Response to Trump’s Immunity Case:
- She did not fully join the majority opinion, arguing it went too far in protecting presidential actions from scrutiny.
Federal Agencies Weakened
- Chevron Deference Toppled:
- The court reduced the power of federal agencies by challenging the Chevron deference doctrine.
- SEC Judges and Regulation Challenges:
- The court ruled against the Securities and Exchange Commission’s in-house judges and imposed time limits for challenging federal regulations.
Ethics Code and Standing Doctrine
- Toothless Ethics Code:
- The court adopted a formal ethics code lacking enforcement mechanisms, criticized for insufficiently addressing issues like recusal and luxury gifts.
- New Favorite Dodge:
- The court frequently avoided politically sensitive cases by ruling that plaintiffs lacked legal standing, such as in the abortion pill and social media censorship cases.
Broader Implications
- Potential Long-Term Impact:
- The term’s rulings could have lasting effects on American politics and policy, shaping the balance of power between federal agencies and the judiciary.
- Political and Legal Ramifications:
- The decisions provide significant wins for Trump and set new precedents on presidential immunity and agency power, influencing future legal and political battles.
This term, marked by Trump’s notable victories and significant legal shifts, highlights the Supreme Court’s influential role in shaping the nation’s legal landscape.
Subscribe to our newsletter
COMMENTS