In a surprising development, special counsel Jack Smith indicates that Donald Trump’s efforts to assemble false slates of presidential electors in 2020 could provide legal cover amid a potential Supreme Court ruling.
Challenging Obstruction Law Interpretation
Smith’s recent filing suggests that even if the Supreme Court backs defendants challenging the obstruction law’s application, charges against Trump may stand. The challenge argues that the law was misused against pro-Trump rioters and should only apply to evidence tampering.
Qualifying as Obstruction
Smith contends that Trump’s attempt to enlist allies in seven swing states to sign fraudulent certificates constitutes obstruction, regardless of the law’s interpretation. This stance aligns with the Justice Department’s position in the ongoing Fischer v. United States case.
Emphasizing Accountability
Smith emphasizes that Trump’s actions cannot be shielded by claims of immunity, as they were not tied to his official duties as president. He argues for accountability, stating that no individual, including a former president, should be above the law.
High-Stakes Legal Battle
As legal battles unfold, the implications of Trump’s false elector scheme continue to reverberate. With federal criminal cases against Trump not expected to head to trial anytime soon, the stage is set for high-stakes legal confrontations in the coming months.
COMMENTS