U.S. President Donald Trump is seen on a screen through a window into an empty conference room in New York, U.S., September 22, 2020. REUTERS/Mike Segar/File Photo
Trump’s Potential Military and Defense Policies in Second Term Raise Concerns at Pentagon
Following Donald Trump’s re-election, significant questions arise within the Pentagon regarding how he might handle military leadership and Department of Defense (DoD) policies in his second term. Trump’s campaign rhetoric, which included promises to remove “woke” military leaders, has fueled speculation about potential reforms and high-level personnel changes. Current and former U.S. officials indicate that loyalty will be a core criterion for Trump’s military and civilian appointments, signaling possible shifts in defense policies and practices.
Tensions with Military Leadership
In his previous term, Trump frequently clashed with Pentagon leaders on issues ranging from NATO skepticism to the potential deployment of troops during domestic unrest. His former defense officials have been vocal critics, with some questioning his fitness for office. In response, Trump has targeted key figures, such as former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, even suggesting he could face treason charges.
Senator Jack Reed, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, expressed concerns over Trump’s anticipated actions, suggesting he might remove military leaders perceived as insufficiently loyal. Trump himself publicly stated he would dismiss “woke” generals, a term he associates with progressive social policies in the military. Many within the Pentagon worry that Trump’s second term could see an extensive reshaping of military leadership, prioritizing loyalty over experience or policy expertise.
Concerns About Current Joint Chiefs Chair and Diversity Initiatives
Pentagon officials are particularly concerned about the future of Air Force General C.Q. Brown, current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. General Brown, a respected military leader known for supporting diversity within the armed forces, has avoided engaging in politics but has publicly addressed issues like racial discrimination. Trump’s vice president-elect, J.D. Vance, previously opposed Brown’s appointment, citing skepticism toward perceived resistance within the military to Trump’s directives.
During the campaign, Trump emphasized anti-woke policies, promising to reverse name changes of military bases and reinstate restrictions on transgender service members. His messaging included strong language against diversity-focused initiatives, signaling possible moves to eliminate such policies within the military.
Proposed Military Deployment for Domestic Policies
Trump has proposed utilizing military resources to advance key policy goals, such as the mass deportation of undocumented immigrants and potential deployments to handle civil unrest. Experts caution that such actions could have legal ramifications, potentially alienating the public and challenging military laws around the use of armed forces on U.S. soil. Nonetheless, military officials stress that personnel remain focused on security and adherence to lawful orders.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, following Trump’s election win, emphasized that the military would follow “all lawful orders.” However, legal experts, including Kori Schake of the American Enterprise Institute, warn that Trump’s ability to interpret legal boundaries broadly could test military personnel faced with morally complex orders.
Implications for Civilian Ranks at the Pentagon
Beyond military leaders, career civil servants at the Pentagon may face scrutiny. Trump has indicated an interest in streamlining the federal workforce, potentially replacing career officials with loyalists through executive orders or regulatory adjustments. Pentagon insiders have expressed concern about potential purges, which could impact the department’s expertise and continuity.
One senior defense official noted that Trump’s prior administration faced internal resistance to certain policies, such as suggestions to launch missiles into Mexico. This resistance, mainly from Pentagon officials and career civil servants, helped prevent some controversial ideas from becoming policy. Officials now worry that Trump’s intent to assert more control over civilian ranks could undermine long-standing institutional knowledge and create significant operational challenges.
COMMENTS