The Harris campaign has been found editing headlines and descriptions in Google search ads to make it appear as if major news outlets like The Guardian, Reuters, and CBS News are endorsing her, a tactic that has raised concerns among media companies and tech platforms.
The Issue
These ads, while not violating Google’s policies, mimic real news results closely enough that they could mislead voters into thinking the news outlets themselves are supportive of Harris. The ads are labeled as “Sponsored,” but the text accompanying the real news links is written by the campaign, not the news outlet. This has caught several media companies off guard, with many unaware that their brand was being used in this manner.
Media Response
A spokesperson for The Guardian expressed concern, stating they would reach out to Google for more information, highlighting the importance of maintaining the integrity of their brand. Other media companies, including CNN, USA Today, and NPR, also indicated they were unaware of their inclusion in these ads.
Google’s Stance
Google has defended the practice, arguing that the “Sponsored” label is sufficient to distinguish these ads from genuine search results. A Google spokesperson also noted that election advertisers must undergo an identity verification process and that the company provides in-ad disclosures to show who paid for the ad.
The Broader Impact
This tactic has sparked a debate over the ethics of political advertising and the potential for such ads to mislead voters. While the ads are legal, they raise questions about the fine line between transparency and manipulation in digital political campaigns.
COMMENTS