The European Commission on Wednesday faced intense questioning over U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s remarks about potentially taking over Greenland by force. Despite journalists’ repeated inquiries, the Commission maintained a cautious stance, emphasizing respect for state sovereignty but refusing to speculate on the likelihood of military action.
Trump’s Provocative Statement
During a press conference Tuesday, Trump raised eyebrows by refusing to rule out the use of military force to seize Greenland and the Panama Canal, framing their control as essential for U.S. “economic security.” The remarks immediately drew sharp criticism, particularly from France, where officials underscored the EU’s commitment to defending its sovereign borders.
EU’s Muted Response
At the Commission’s briefing, spokesperson Anitta Hipper reaffirmed the EU’s dedication to sovereignty but refrained from addressing Trump’s statement directly. “The sovereignty of states has to be respected,” Hipper stated, while stressing the importance of strengthening the transatlantic partnership under the new U.S. administration.
Pressed on whether the EU views a U.S. invasion of Greenland as a real threat, Hipper described the scenario as “very theoretical.” She also confirmed that any attack on Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory, would invoke the EU’s mutual defense clause under Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union.
Journalists Push Back
Hipper’s measured response did little to satisfy journalists, some of whom drew parallels to the EU’s initial handling of Russia’s prelude to its 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Italian journalist David Carretta questioned whether the Commission recognized the risk of military action from the U.S. “What President Trump said was a military threat to a member state. Are you conscious that there is a risk?” Carretta asked, highlighting the potential implications of Trump’s remarks.
Euractiv’s Nicholas Wallace criticized the Commission’s reticence. “Are you waiting for American marines to land in Greenland or what?” he asked, underscoring the perceived inadequacy of the EU’s response.
France Takes a Firmer Stance
France’s foreign minister offered a more direct rebuke, warning that the EU would not tolerate threats to its territorial sovereignty. However, this clarity was absent from the Commission’s statements, leading to further criticism of its cautious approach.
A Growing Diplomatic Challenge
Trump’s comments pose a delicate challenge for the EU, which seeks to balance its commitment to defending member states’ sovereignty with the need to maintain strong ties with the incoming U.S. administration. Whether the situation escalates or dissipates, the EU’s handling of this incident may set a precedent for future transatlantic tensions.
COMMENTS