HomeInternational News

Denmark Responds to U.S. Criticism Over Greenland Security

Former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt has criticized U.S. President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance over their remarks about Denmark’s role in Greenland. She emphasized Denmark’s longstanding alliance with the U.S. and pointed out that the U.S. already has military access to Greenland under existing agreements.

Vice President JD Vance and second lady Usha Vance pose during a tour of Pituffik Space Base on March 28, 2025, in Greenland. | Jim Watson/Pool via AP

Danish Former PM Criticizes U.S. Remarks on Greenland

Helle Thorning-Schmidt, Denmark’s former prime minister, expressed disappointment over recent statements by President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance regarding Greenland. She argued that Denmark has been a strong ally of the United States for decades and called the criticism “insulting.”


Trump’s Push for Control Over Greenland

Trump has repeatedly suggested that the U.S. should take control of Greenland for national security reasons. He has even refused to rule out a military invasion. His administration views Greenland as strategically important due to its Arctic location and resources.


Vice President JD Vance’s Visit to Greenland

During his recent visit to Greenland, Vice President JD Vance criticized Denmark, claiming it had failed to keep the territory secure. His comments sparked backlash from Danish officials, including Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, who called them inappropriate for allies.


Denmark’s Military Contributions and NATO Role

Thorning-Schmidt highlighted Denmark’s military support for U.S. operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. She also reminded the U.S. that Greenland is NATO territory, meaning America already has military access under a 1951 treaty.


A History of U.S. Military Presence in Greenland

The U.S. had multiple military bases in Greenland during the Cold War, with 16 operational bases at its peak. Denmark has recently increased security investments in the region, and Thorning-Schmidt argued that the U.S. can expand its presence within the current NATO framework without seeking full control.

Subscribe to our newsletter

COMMENTS