Amidst the ongoing repercussions of the January 6th Capitol breach, allegations of the FBI’s reluctance in pursuing credible claims of corrupt dealings involving the Biden family have surfaced. Recent reports from Just the News have shed light on these accusations, revealing a complex web of issues and concerns surrounding the investigations. The controversy revolves around the agency’s handling of evidence provided by numerous informants over an extended period, raising questions about transparency and accountability.
Key Allegations and Revelations:
- Probing Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian Dealings
Former Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney Scott Brady disclosed that his team discovered substantial evidence related to Hunter Biden’s involvement with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings and possible corruption by Joe Biden. This evidence prompted Brady to refer criminal matters to three different U.S. Attorney’s offices for further investigation. However, he faced resistance from the FBI and the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s office during the course of his assignment, creating a challenging working relationship. - Reluctance of the FBI
Brady highlighted the FBI’s reluctance in addressing the assigned task of investigating Ukrainian corruption allegations, particularly those intersecting with Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma. He noted skepticism and weariness among FBI officials, hindering information sharing and cooperation. The difficulties encountered in interactions with the investigative team from Delaware added to the complexity of the situation. - Extensive Informant Network
Senator Chuck Grassley revealed that the FBI had maintained over 40 Confidential Human Sources who provided criminal information related to the Biden family over an extended period. Such a large informant network is unusual and has raised concerns about the allocation of taxpayer resources. It surpasses the scale observed in cases involving organized crime or RICO investigations. - Questions Raised
Grassley expressed the need for clarity on whether the FBI thoroughly investigated the information provided by these informants or deliberately suppressed the inquiries. He identified 25 Department of Justice and FBI personnel for potential interviews, aiming to shed light on the allegations.
Ongoing Investigations and Implications:
These revelations come as investigations into the Biden family’s financial dealings continue. House investigations have already uncovered substantial foreign payments linked to Biden family businesses. The controversy surrounding the handling of these investigations raises concerns about transparency, political influence, and the integrity of the justice system.
The allegations of the FBI’s reluctance in investigating Biden family matters, coupled with the extensive informant network, have ignited a new wave of controversy. Questions regarding the true extent of investigations and potential interference demand thorough scrutiny as ongoing investigations into the first family persist.
COMMENTS