HomeElection NewsNews by State

Commission won’t tell Wisconsin’s top elections official whether to appear at reappointment hearing

Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe poses for a photograph outside the Wisconsin Capitol building, Aug. 31, 2020, in Madison, Wis. The Wisconsin Elections Commission declined to vote Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2023, on whether Wolfe should appear before a state Senate hearing on her reappointment as a fight continues over who will lead elections in the critical battleground state ahead of the 2024 presidential race. (Ruthie Hauge/Wisconsin State Journal via AP, File)

Amid a tumultuous and politically charged atmosphere, the Wisconsin Elections Commission confronted a decision regarding the appearance of the state’s top elections official, Meagan Wolfe, before a Senate hearing concerning her reappointment. The ongoing feud is emblematic of the battle over leadership in Wisconsin, a critical battleground state, as it braces for the 2024 presidential contest.

In a precarious predicament, Meagan Wolfe, the administrator of the commission, is now left to determine whether she will testify before the state Senate, which is under Republican control and is actively seeking to trigger a vote to remove her from office.

The origins of this conundrum stem from a bipartisan impasse within the elections commission on June 27. The commission split along party lines, with Democrats abstaining to deliberately thwart the reappointment of Wolfe. This maneuver was intended to cause her nomination to fail, as it requires at least four commissioners to endorse it. A recent state Supreme Court ruling has created an ambiguous situation, seemingly allowing Wolfe to remain at the helm of the elections commission beyond the expiration of her term, even without formal reappointment.

In a surprising turn of events, Senate Republicans endeavored to advance the reappointment process despite the deadlock. In an unexpected vote, they resolved to convene a committee hearing and ultimately subject her to a vote on her termination.

The commission, however, abstained from voting on a motion concerning Wolfe’s participation in the Senate elections committee hearing. Commissioners contended that this responsibility falls outside their purview, with Democratic Commissioner Ann Jacobs emphasizing Wolfe’s role as the chief elections officer of the state.

Yet, partisan divisions persist over the legitimacy of the Senate’s actions. While Democratic Commissioner Ann Jacobs dismissed the Senate’s approach as a “circus” built on a misinterpretation of the law, Republican Chair Don Millis voiced concerns that if Wolfe does not appear, it could further escalate an already tense situation.

The Senate has yet to schedule the committee hearing for Wolfe’s reappointment, leaving uncertainty regarding her eventual decision on her appearance.

This episode in Wisconsin underscores the high-stakes battles over electoral administration, reflecting the broader polarization that characterizes American politics. As the state readies itself for the upcoming presidential election, the power struggle surrounding leadership in election management remains a critical and fiercely contested issue.

Subscribe to our newsletter

COMMENTS