As the U.S. faces a staggering $36 trillion debt, prominent figures like Jeff Bezos, Larry Fink, and Scott Bessent argue that turbocharging economic growth is the key to addressing the country’s fiscal challenges. However, history suggests this may not be a straightforward solution.
The Growth Argument: Can the U.S. Grow Its Way Out of Debt?
Scott Bessent, former Chief Investment Officer for George Soros’ fund, warned that this may be the “last chance” for the U.S. to grow its way out of the massive debt without becoming a “European-style socialist democracy.” Meanwhile, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has urged the incoming administration to prioritize artificial intelligence and infrastructure investments as the tools needed to boost the economy and reduce the deficit. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos echoed similar sentiments, asserting that expanding the economy by 3 to 5 percent annually while reducing the annual deficit would make the U.S. debt “manageable.”
However, this ambitious goal of sustained high growth is a tall order. While past presidents, such as Bill Clinton in the 1990s, achieved significant budget surpluses amid robust economic growth, sustaining such growth over time has proven difficult. Even former President Ronald Reagan, despite reducing deficits in some years, struggled with mounting debt during his presidency.
Trump’s Economic Growth Plan: Lower Taxes and Looser Regulations
Former President Donald Trump has promised that his administration will generate “explosive” economic growth by cutting taxes, deregulating industries, ramping up energy production, and imposing tariffs. His plan also includes reducing government budgets by “trillions” and eliminating government waste. Trump’s allies believe that reducing taxes and regulatory burdens will stimulate business investment, which in turn will drive economic growth and lower the deficit.
Joseph LaVorgna, a former Trump administration economist, suggests that a government efficiency overhaul, spearheaded by figures like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, could eliminate billions in wasteful federal spending. This, according to LaVorgna, would help improve the U.S. fiscal outlook, increase private investment, and lower interest rates.
Challenges to Trump’s Economic Agenda
Despite these optimistic projections, critics argue that relying solely on economic growth to solve the debt crisis is unrealistic. Economists like Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed Income, contend that a sustained 5 percent growth rate would be necessary to make a significant impact on the debt. Porcelli emphasized that growth alone won’t suffice without addressing the structural factors driving the debt, particularly entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare, which represent the largest share of U.S. spending.
Trump has repeatedly vowed not to touch these entitlement programs, which many believe are the main drivers of the debt. Without reforms to these programs, the fiscal challenges will persist. Furthermore, imposing tariffs could lead to retaliatory measures, potentially harming U.S. growth.
Structural Reforms: The Key to Debt Reduction?
Fiscal watchdogs, such as those at the Penn Wharton Budget Model, argue that tackling the debt will require more than just growth. Structural reforms — including changes to the tax code, immigration policies, and healthcare — are necessary to reduce deficits over the long term. Kent Smetters, a former Treasury official and faculty director at Penn Wharton, noted that “almost all spending in the government is already tied to growth,” making it nearly impossible to reduce the debt without addressing these underlying cost drivers.
Smetters also pointed out that even innovations like artificial intelligence could lead to higher costs in sectors like healthcare, exacerbating the fiscal burden of entitlement programs.
The Debate Over Tax Cuts: Will Expiration Help?
One potential solution to the debt crisis is allowing some provisions of Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to expire. This would increase tax revenues, although it could slow economic growth in the short term. However, economists like Mark Zandi from Moody’s Analytics argue that while regulatory and efficiency improvements could provide some benefits, they are unlikely to significantly shift the macroeconomic picture without broader structural reforms.
Conclusion: Can Growth Alone Solve the Debt Crisis?
While many continue to push for economic growth as the key to addressing the U.S. debt crisis, experts agree that such an approach will not be sufficient on its own. Tax and entitlement reforms are essential if the U.S. is to tackle its fiscal challenges effectively. Whether or not the country can achieve the kind of sustained growth needed to make a meaningful impact on the debt remains to be seen.
COMMENTS