HomeNews by StateOhio

Ahead of abortion vote, Ohioans weigh making it harder to amend constitution

Abortion rights supporters have accused Republican lawmakers of trying to thwart the will of the majority and chip away at voters’ voices

From left, Susan Polakoff Shaw, Maureen McDermott, Nora Katzenberger and Brigid Boettler help last month in the West Park neighborhood of Cleveland to assemble voter information packets and yard signs opposing Tuesday’s ballot measure to make it harder to amend the state constitution. (Dustin Franz for The Washington Post)

In Ohio, a contentious battle ensues as citizens prepare to vote in a special election to decide the future of abortion rights and the state’s citizen initiative process. For over a century, Ohioans have had the power to amend the state constitution by gathering signatures and securing a simple majority vote. This mechanism has allowed them to push for changes when politicians fail to address their concerns.

However, the current Republican-led state legislature seeks to alter this process, proposing that constitutional amendments should require the support of 60 percent of voters instead of a simple majority. The motive behind this move is to introduce a higher threshold, akin to that of the U.S. Constitution, to prevent frivolous amendments and the influence of out-of-state interest groups.

The main issue at stake in this election is access to abortion. Abortion rights advocates have put forward a measure to guarantee access to abortion, following recent restrictions imposed by the state. Opponents argue that the proposed change in the initiative process is an attempt to hinder voters’ voices and suppress progressive policies.

Supporters of the 60 percent threshold believe it will ensure careful consideration of constitutional amendments and prevent policies that conservatives would oppose. Critics contend that this would impede efforts to end partisan gerrymandering and promote fair representation.

As the election approaches, both sides have raised substantial funds and attracted intense interest from voters. A recent poll indicates that a majority of voters oppose raising the vote threshold, making the outcome uncertain. Moreover, the result could have broader implications for the abortion debate nationwide, with abortion rights proving to be a significant political issue since the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade.

In the midst of this debate, Ohioans must decide whether to uphold the current initiative process and guarantee access to abortion or support a higher threshold, potentially limiting their ability to shape the state’s constitution in the future. Tuesday’s vote carries substantial consequences for democracy and citizens’ rights in Ohio and may set a precedent for similar battles across the country.

Subscribe to our newsletter

COMMENTS