In a significant development in the bribery case involving Senator Bob Menendez, a USDA official testified about early concerns over a meat monopoly awarded to IS EG Halal. This New Jersey-based company, owned by Wael “Will” Hana, is at the center of allegations involving bribery and political influence.
Bret Tate, the USDA official stationed in Cairo, raised alarms after Egypt granted IS EG Halal a monopoly on certifying American meat as halal. Tate’s testimony revealed his surprise at meeting Hana under unusual circumstances and learning of the sudden market control shift, which disrupted plans to increase the number of U.S. halal certifiers.
IS EG Halal’s monopoly, obtained in 2019, raised concerns due to the company’s lack of established operations compared to other certifiers. Tate noted that IS EG Halal charged significantly higher fees, potentially harming American beef exporters and Egyptian consumers dependent on affordable meat.
Tate reported his suspicions to the FBI, hinting at possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. While not directly implicating Menendez initially, the case expanded to include allegations of the senator’s involvement in maintaining Hana’s monopoly in exchange for bribes.
Defense arguments highlight Hana’s connections and efforts within Egypt, claiming these justified his company’s exclusive rights. However, Tate’s report underscored the adverse economic impact and disruption caused by the monopoly.
Federal prosecutors also faced a challenge when FBI agent Aristotelis Kougemitros corrected his testimony about evidence locations, benefiting Menendez’s defense.
The trial continues, with the defense expected to cross-examine Tate and address the monopoly’s broader implications on U.S.-Egypt trade relations and regulatory practices.
COMMENTS